Rough Draft Assignment 2
by Juliette and Pratheep
As you already know, we need to deal with air pollution in order to address global warming! I created a comparison chart to examine Ozone, Sulphur Dioxide, Nitrogen Dioxide, Total reduced sulphur compounds, Carbon monoxide, and Fine particulate matter.
As you can see in the chart, there are sources and impacts of the various problems of air quality:
Air | Problem | Source | Impact |
Ozone | -The concentration of ozone in the atmosphere (especially altitude before around 1km of the surface of the earth) is getting higher. | -The emission gas from the car, which consists of nitrogen oxide (NOx) that provokes photosynthesis process by the strong ultraviolet energy. | -Since ozone contains a matter that reacts stronger compared to the oxygen, it can stimulate the mucous membrane of lung or the skin. The high concentration of ozone can especially be fatal to an old or feeble person as well as an asthma patient. |
Sulphur Dioxide | -The emission from sulphur dioxide creates misty sky. | The principal source is considered as the coal. Whenever the factory or the household burn the coal, it starts to belch up sulphur dioxide and the smoke. | -It becomes a harsh pollutant and harms animals, plants, and human beings on a strong sunny day and especially when there is no wind. |
Nitrogen Dioxide | -The concentration of nitrogen dioxide increased by 40% ever since 1980. | -It comes from car, truck, bus, powerhouse, industrial equipment, etc. | -It has a huge impact on human’s health, specifically to children, asthma patient, and senior. It can also cause respiratory ailments. |
Total reduced sulphur compounds | -It generates offensive odours akin to rotten eggs or cabbage. | -The sources are regarded as steel industry, pulp and paper mills, refineries, and sewage treatment facilities. Moreover, the natural sources are swamps, bogs, and marshes. | -Total reduced sulphur compounds generally do not have impact on health, but each component differs from one another. It can cause nausea and headaches and if it is released into the atmosphere, it can contribute to the acidity of the environment, because of sulphuric acid it contains. |
Carbon monoxide | -Almost every matter while burning can release carbon monoxide. | -It comes from any matter that is burnt, such as an exhaust pipe, a tobacco, an air conditioner, a radiator, etc. | -If inhaled, it attaches to hemoglobin and may cause headache. If one is in airtight place, he or she can die due to an addiction of carbon monoxide. |
Fine particulate matter | -People are breathing air with fine particulate matter and that the atmosphere must be purified according to the experts. | -It comes from a diesel combustion truck, a powerhouse, a heater that burns trees, and other pollution sources. | -It can cause problems with the respiratory organs as well as the heart problem. |
There are many ways to express concerns regarding climate change, whether it’s through a movie like Al Gore’s “The Inconvenient Truth”, through published books such as “Climate Wars” by Gwynne Dyer. This week, I want to talk about one of my favourite ways of expressing, through my favourite form of art – music.
Celebrities have the power to influence their fans, whatever message they contain in their songs will be spread to the fans. For example, many people may be inspired by expressive artists who really try hard to get their message through, a recent example would be Lady GaGa’s “Born This Way”, her way of expressing the message of “you are who you are, do not be ashamed of who you are because we are all beautiful.” Powerful messages within music can be delivered to a lot of people!
Now here’s an example of an artist talking about global issues, and most of us heard his music, from the summer hit “Nothin’ On You” to “Just the Way You Are”, Bruno Mars recently collaborated with rapper Big Lou on a song titled “We Are Fighters”, talking about global issues. With Bruno Mars singing on the chorus: “In this life, we are fighters / And the world they try to divide us / Time is running out / We don’t have forever / Unless we break down / This war, stand together…”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1SxGn4LGXY
And of course, from one of the most powerful artists ever lived, Michael Jackson, who sung about our problems on Planet Earth through “Earth Song”. The powerful video definitely reached out to many people.
Last year, during the 2010 Grammy Awards, artists such as Jennifer Hudson, Carrie Underwood, Smokey Robinson, Celine Dion, and Usher performed this song as a tribute to the star, may he rest in peace. Events that usually gather a lot of attention from people, and using these events to spread these messages is the perfect way to educate people on issues such as climate change.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxb548Jpck0
Even movies that reach out to a younger audience can spread these messages, for example the Disney/Pixar animated feature “WALL-E”, featuring the song “Down to Earth” by Peter Gabriel, a cute robot and an amazing story is all you need to spread the message of “If we keep up what we are doing the planet, we will eventually destroy our own planet”
Of course, who can forget the classic hit of “Big Yellow Taxi” by Joni Mitchell? Later covered by The Counting Crows and Vanessa Carlton? The amazing line of “They paved paradise / and put up a parking lot / They took all the trees / And put ’em in a tree museum / And they charged the people / a dollar and a half to see ’em”
Artists have the power to influence people with just a song, if more artists from all different kinds of genre of music can make songs about climate change or ANY global issue for that matter for their fans, the messages will be spread. Eventually, this is a way of spreading the word, so that we won’t “wait on the world to change”
Hey everyone,
I don’t have a partner for the assignment (due this Friday!), and we aren’t allowed to work by ourselves. If anyone has room for another partner I’ll do whatever you need me to.
My e-mail address is dilair.singh@utoronto.ca
Thank you!
Hello, guys! In order to deal with global warming, I think we need to consider how we use the resources of the environment day by day! So I just wanted to have a discussion on this topic..:)
Let’s check around our houses and consider the sources of contaminants and toxins that could affect us. Which do you use regularly? What are the warnings and cautions that you should be concerned about?
Well, here is my anwer to these questions!
First off, I think use of computer will affect me, because it consists of a huge amount of electromagnetic wave. I regularly use a computer and a television and I should be aware of my health since it can pose a danger. Moreover, whenever I do not turn off the lights before leaving my room, it would also have a huge impact on the environment. I should also be concerned about the garbage can in the kitchen and the washroom, because our family is not used to recycling. Thus, I will now be aware of all the sources of contaminants and toxins that can affect me around my house and start taking an action to reduce these.
In deciding what to write this blog post about, I found myself looking at notes from a course I took last semester called “Introduction to Environmental Studies”. The course, taught by Professor Stephen Sharper, provided me with a brief but widely spread representation of many of the theories and treatments for our current environmental problem. Some of these ideas shape the way we approach this dilemma so I think it is important to keep them in mind in the approach to any of the environmental problems we face. Out of the several theories we learned about, there was one that stuck the most. It is the one that I felt the closest connection to and the one I will speak to you about for the next little bit.
Out of everything I’ve learned and theories I’ve studied so far, my favorite is the Gaia theory. Originally developed by John Lovelock in the 60s, this theory was developed in an attempt to find ways to identify life in other planets. Working under NASA, Lovelock was assigned to come up with a series of life defining characteristics that scientist could use to look for life in outer space. In this process, Lovelock discovered we know a lot about everything in life, but barely anything about life itself, what it is and how it forms.
The following link is a great video with David Suzuki and James Lovelock that will help you understand how the theory came about: The Sacred Balance – Gaia Hypothesis
In modern science, not too many scientists had set out to define life, but the ones that did all came to the same vague conclusion;
Along with Dian Hitchcock, another scientist trying do discover the potential for life in o other planets, Lovelock realized that the main characteristics of what we call life are very clearly present in our own atmosphere. In his book, “Gaia” Lovelock describes this discovery very simply.
That is, our planet is a living organism. The planet itself as well as the atmosphere around it is a self adjusting combination of gasses and other elements that is able to maintain the perfect conditions for all of the organism within it (all life on earth) to survive.
A good way to picture this is to imagine the word as a body. The body adjust to the environment it’s in to maintain conditions inside it at a stage where the organs can work to sustain the body itself. Without well functioning organs the body cannot function properly and it begins to break down. Without a chemically balanced atmosphere or solid screen from the suns radiation, the earth begins to get sick.
This make you wonder, what is our position in this body? If we continue to deteriorate the earth’s main organs – the oceans, ozone layer, etc – like we are, we will become like a parasite to the worldly body. We are sickening the earth in a way that it cannot maintain its conditions, something like a fever, if it’s not controlled, the body will eventually cease to function.
At its origin, the Gaia hypothesis was a huge mess of long scientific words that not a lot of people understood or agreed with, however, like other useful theories, it has proven it’s theoretical value and it is now shaping the way leaders in environmental sustainability act. With the help of author William Golding, Lovelock was able to express his idea in a way we could all understand, and also changed the name from “the hypothesis that the biosphere is a self regulatory entity with capacity to keep our planet healthy by controlling the chemical and physical environment” to “Gaia” as we refer to it today, the ancient Greek word for Mother Earth.
Like any other theory going through criticism and development it has changed since it’s original form, in Lovelocks words;
“We have since defined Gaia as a complex entity involving the Earth’s biosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and soil; the totality constituting a feedback or cybernetic system which seeks an optimal physical and chemical environment for life on this planet. The maintenance of relatively constant conditions by active control may be conveniently described by the term ‘homoeostasis’.”
Since I first hear about Gaia last semester I’ve noticed how applicable the theory really is. Analyzing the world around me it seems very real to me that we are part of something bigger. However, our potential to destroy it is bigger than ever. I think it is important to understand this in order to appreciate what we have and want to preserve it. We must apply the same laws we do to any living organism onto the earth. Think of it as an animal at the verge of extinction; we must protect it and let it grow strong, however we cannot regenerate it. All we can do is provide it with the right conditions and shelter it from danger to allow it to grow strong on its own. After all that is what life seems to be, a self reliant self adjusting organism.
At last, I’d like to leave you with one last quote found at the end of the first chapter in “Gaia”. Mother Nature is everything we rely on, we must change our idea of humans as the mean dominant special that must conquer all to a more open minded concept that allows us to understand that we must accept and communicate with our surroundings in order to survive. We need to understand that the earth is not something disconnected to us. We are a part of it as it is a part of us and that is why we must love it like we do ourselves, nurture it and connect with it. I’m not suggesting we all become tree huger fanatics, but simply that we take a little time each day to appreciate the beauty of it and help maintain it.
For a more in depth analysis and explanation of Gaia theory follow this link to Dr. Stephan Harding YouTube channel and watch the 10 part series of videos named Gaia Theory & Deep Ecology. Also, you can follow this link for a 5 part series of videos of a presentation by Lovelock himself where he gives some suggestions as to ways we can help our planet.
For those interested in more information about the Gaia theory you can visit these sites:
This was the reading we had about Gaia in my Environmental class: Gaia, A New Look at Life
Also use:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_hypothesis
“The film the inconvenient truth has ruined my life after the day I’ve watched it.” Said John Hardy, the co-founder of the Green School at the TED talk. Don’t get him wrong readers! He didn’t mean this in a bad way, but the opposite. That day was actually the turning point of his life and that’s how he got the idea of building the Green School. “Even if what part of it Mr. Gore’s said is true, my children are not going to live the life that I had. I’ve decided at that moment, I would spend the rest of my life, doing whatever I could to increase their possibilities.” By having such thoughts, he then started building the Green School in Bali.
The Green School is not just another ordinary school that aims at promoting ideas such as recycling and energy saving. It aims at “empowering global citizens and green innovators who are inspired to take responsibility for the world”. The Green School sits in south-central, Bali, on 20 acres of gardens. Instead of the usual image of what a school should be with bricks and concrete walls, the school is built primarily from bamboo which is a natural and renewable resource. The co-founder John Hardy made it very clear that the aim of the Green School is to promote valuable and useful skills to create a new generation of global, green leaders. Instead of having class in classrooms with walls and blackboard, students here at Green School gain their knowledge by connecting with the nature because the building itself and the surroundings are powerful tools. It allows students opportunities to learn about science, math social studies, economics and language arts thorough hands-on real world experience. It is the kind of experience that they will still use after they have left school and in their daily life. For example, instead of learning energy from textbook, they can use energy meters and mathematics to calculate the energy consumption and cost. I really wish I had that kind of science class too!!! I’m sure I would like science a lot more!!!
Every aspect of the site and buildings are living examples of sustainability. Micro-hydro power, solar power and bio-diesel are used. Green School standard is to use 99% natural materials in their construction projects, to recycle as many materials as possible, and to manage waste responsibly.
The “greenness” of the school can be easily seen around campus. The school cow is used to replace the lawnmower on the playing field. Instead of writing on blackboards or whiteboards, they write on bamboo blackboards. Instead of use lights and air-conditioning, they use natural lights and natural breeze. “The school’s magnificent bamboo architecture is an outstanding example of the ecological, spiritual and aesthetic benefits of working with nature rather than against her.” Said Helena Norberg-Hodge, the Founder and Director of International Society of Ecology and Culture in London.
The world is not indestructible; one day energy and resources will all be used up. In the sense of learning how to live a sustainable future, the Green School sets a really good example to the world and has done a fantastic job. The idea of Green School is one of the first but certainly not the last, seeing the success I’m sure more yet to come. If each place in every country can have a school like this to instill the idea of sustainable living, our future generations can still have a chance to enjoy the life that we had. They can still have a chance to experience blue skies and cool breeze. Just remember, “Let the nature take the lead”, because nature is where all possibilities begin! Each of us make a difference, and it is ultimately our collective activities that make the world what it is.
Click to see a report on the Green school by BBC News:
http://www.greenschool.org/2010/08/10/bbc-interview/
Hey, readers. This is my second blog and it’s actually a follow-up to my previous blog titled “Misconceptions about Climate Change”. I was delighted to see that many people read it and more than a few of the readers took the time to give me insightful, yet critical comments. I feel obliged to mention Ms. Abayomi as well as Mr. Jon Pippetone for their feedback. On my last post, I have realized that, I attempted to tackle multiple issues but did not successfully do justice to any one of them. If you don’t remember I started off by talking about communication of information regarding climate change between the scientists and politicians as well everyday citizens and then I dove into misconceptions about climate change without giving any suggestions for the previous. I do apologize for this and I will shamelessly blame this on the fact that I had many things to say and also it was my first blog and I was maybe a bit naive. I have decided that the latter part of this post will focus on what I originally started. I will begin with a restating of what I mentioned before and add on to that with some new suggestions as well as some statistics and evidence. Unfortunately, I have decided to omit the misconceptions part because that is another sub-topic, one that I do not wish to dive into until I have gathered much more information. To those who were looking forward to info regarding that topic, I not only send my apologies but have also posted web links to web-pages that do discuss some misconceptions that you can look into.
Climate change is a very serious issue for not only the well being of our planet Earth but the well being and survivals of us, as a species. Chances are that, unless you’ve been living under a rock for the past decade or so, you are aware of this. Heck, even if you’ve been ice skating with some emperor penguins in the Antarctic
or fishing with a few polar bears in the Arctic you’ve would’ve noticed the melting ice and glaciers slowly breaking down. Though not as heavily publicized and valued, maybe rightfully so, as cancer awareness, the AIDS epidemic, or even the rising population paired with dwindling resources, climate change has been gaining notoriety at fairly quick pace.
In my opinion and I’m sure many people would agree with me, one of the biggest problems facing the battle against climate change is perhaps the transfer of essential information regarding the topic. Scientists, most of whom have exclusive background in the sciences do not always have the easiest time conveying the information concerning climate change to politicians and policy makers, most of whom usually have very little to no formal training, especially of higher level, in the environmental sciences.
i.e..
Compare two graphs both depicting global warming over time. One graph starts in the 1800’s and ends in 2009. This graph shows that the planet has warmed more than 1 degree Celsius over that time period. The second graph starts in 1940 and ends in 2009 as well, but since the start point is later the net increase does seem as dramatic or as great a value in the first graph. ( There are two excellent graphs showing this that my professor showed me in class and I promise and upload them in this blog post as soon as I get it from him as I am unable to find the graphs nor the links at the current time!)
This is an example of data, that is very similar shows quite different message, not necessarily because the data has been maliciously manipulated to provide faulty facts, but because the creator of the graph has chosen the data which he wants to share and in a certain way. This is a case where science meets social values, a meaty topic which can have a book about it but one that I will not spend too much time on other than to raise awareness. The important message which I wish to convey is that based on which graph one looks at, whether be an interested reader or influential political figure, it may influence the reaction in a totally different way. The first graph would cause alarm and pose an immediate course of action while the second graph would give the sense of not so urgent, and possibly more time to work on a course of action for the issue.
With so many different organizations and scientists researching and publishing on the issue, it is actually quite difficult to come to solid conclusions and that is one of the reasons that there are many people who don’t feel the urgency to act now! The other issue that I had with the communication of climate change is the disagreement between the scientists themselves who are working in the field. (Click for video about prominent figure being sued for claims he made!) It is very true that science is about disagreement and conflicting views. That is the main reason that science has developed to be as thorough as it is today. Without debate, scientists would be able to prove, or disprove theories, and science would not be able to advance. If scientists Copernicus and Kepler had not challenged the view of the philosopher and mathematician Ptolemy and the church, we might still believe in the geocentric model of the solar system where the sun and all the planets revolve around the Earth rather than the heliocentric model where the planets, including Earth, orbit the Sun . Discussion and conflict are essential and fundamental parts of science. But, that is not what I am arguing, I simply state that the disagreement between the thousands of scientists who believe in and explain climate change and those who disagree with the idea and claim it is a hoax is sending an unclear message to society which consists of many people who rely on the words of these men of science to provide accurate information. Whether you realize it or not, those who oppose climate change get publicity on major networks such as Fox news almost as much as those supporting climate change (click link for video). Sometimes the opposing views are an even hotter story for the news stations who want as much attention as possible. When this happens, viewers don’t know who to trust. Let’s be honest, its much sweeter to hear that climate change is not true or not as bad as they say because it provides relief to those who may possibly be worried.
Coming back to what I was discussing in the before about scientists conveying information to politicians, I think before any fingers can be pointed at politicians policy makers, I believe that the facts should be clear. Take for example the conferences that are held between leaders of the United Nations as well as the most economically powerful nations of the world. At these conferences(recently in Cancun and Copenhagan, it is a combination of scientists, economists, businessmen, doctors, lawyers, etc. that present the facts as well as possible solutions. It is only after hearing all the data and opinions that the government officials start discussing plans of action. The battle against climate change requires co-operation between the government, world leaders, scientists not only working in the field but as well as in other fields, and business people. No one group or entity can be singled out as the ones who are not doing their job. This is not to say that the citizens of this planet, no matter what social class or status don’t have at least a moral obligation to do their part. You, me, and everyone in society cannot wait for the officials to bring change. We have to get the ball rolling. I understand that many of us may have our reasons for not wanting to get involved. These may include that one may be dismissive about the notion of climate change, one may not want to get involved either because they have other things in their lives that they prioritize above the issue of climate change, or one may feel he/she does not know enough about the issue to voice their concerns. The most important factor in getting people to call for action is getting people to understand the scope of the problem. Data and statistics are not very useful if the viewer does not understand it. Anyone can throw out numbers but to attach meaning and value to those numbers is the most important part. I’m sure many of us have heard the quote, “Knowledge is Power” and it is very true.
This is why it is important that every student, no matter field of interest should be exposed to sciences as well as other fields. Getting people educated on the matter is a great idea and starting at students is probably the most efficient way. Students are already in school so it will easier to get the information across to mass numbers whether it be elementary schools all the way to college and universities. Students have the ability to grasp and understand the information well and it is them who climate change will affect in their futures and it is students who can get together and push for action. Think about it, it is much easier to integrate courses about the issue into the curriculum or syllabus than it is to provide information to people who are already in the workforce who lead busy lives or to seniors who may not really care much anymore. The good news is that many of the top universities across the nation and in parts of the world have already took this road and are providing some very interesting and essential courses on environmental sciences. This ranges from introductory courses on climate change such as a seminar I’m currently enrolled at the University of Toronto to more in-depth courses that really dive into the issue. Click on the links for a list of courses in environmental change offered at U of T, Harvard & MIT, as well as some universities in the United Kingdom.
There is much more I would love to talk about but I believe that I have done enough for this one blog post. I hope to post another blog with a more statistical tone which addresses some misconceptions and some of the efforts to change them. I also hope to give you more feedback on my own journey into this subject matter and my experiences in my climate change seminar at University of Toronto. I hope what you have read above in this blog has gotten you thinking about finding reliable information from courses and programs offered across the continent. I have mentioned that information that is out there about climate change, especially in the media can be unclear since so many people from different fields, backgrounds, and levels of education are represented there. If you want to be able to have a good chance of analyzing and judging the information, the best idea is to enrol in courses and learn more. Only then can communication about the issue be transferred more smoothly and efficiently which is essential if we want to call for action and bring about change. Let not only politicians and those in power know how serious society about the issue of climate change but also those around you. Try to bring it up in conversations, we already talk about the weather when there is nothing else to talk about. Communication of information is important and it is the responsibility of all of us to take the initiative!!
If you want to know a bit about how other fields of science such as biology can be related to climate change, check out this blog by one of my peers Tony at the University. He talks about how global temperatures could have affected body size in animals of the past. Another one of my peers, Dustin, posted a post on advertising climate which explores whether the ads are effective in getting the message across. I recommend checking both out as they relate to what I was talking about in this blog.
I look forward to your comments which are ever so helpful. I want to try something where I encourage every reader to post a comment saying what they have done to either fight climate change or know more about it. Please and Thank you!!
It is found that continuation of global warming will worsen the ozone depletion. Ozone depletion becomes worse when the location of the ozone layer, called Stratosphere, gets colder. Since global warming confines heat in the Troposphere, less heat gets to the Stratosphere which will make it colder. Greenhouse gases basically function as a shield for the Troposphere and make the Stratosphere colder.
Ozone layer takes a role to prevent ultraviolet rays, which protects humans from being excessively exposed to the sun. As it is widely known, every living thing on the earth relies on the solar energy to continue with their lives. There has been a component released from the sun, which is Ultraviolet (UV) light that can be extremely harmful to the living things. Ozone and oxygen molecules in the Stratosphere absorb UV light from the Sun, preventing dangerous radiation from affecting human health and the environment. For example, UV light causes skin cancer, cataracts and immune suppression in both animals and humans.
Scientists have discovered that harmful emissions account for much of the damage in the atmosphere and that the ozone layer is being increasingly thinned by human activity. This has led to harmful ultraviolet radiation and the evidence of a large ozone hole which was discovered above the continent of Antarctica in 1985. This ozone hole has been remarkably growing larger and deeper over time due to two major ozone depleting chemicals.
First off, there is significant evidence that emissions of chlorofluorocarbon gas (CFCs) have been causing a significant destruction of ozone in the Stratosphere. It is widely known that chlorofluorocarbon gas contributes to the main cause that continuously destroys the ozone layer. This is mainly released from a refrigerator, an air conditioner, and a hair spray. Once chlorofluorocarbon gas is released, it will eventually destruct the ozone layer by making holes. As a result, the ultraviolet ray comes through the holes, melts a glacier and the surface of the water will soar.
Secondly, Halon gas also ruins the ozone layer and any objects that emits Halon gas is restricted in today’s society. Halon gas consists of similar elements as CFC gas, but it contains bromine instead of chlorine. It can be seen that the relationship between bromine and Halon gas equals to the relationship between chlorine and CFC gas.
Due to these two major ozone depleting chemicals known as CFCs and Halon gas, ultraviolet rays coming through the holes from the ozone layer will ultimately cause skin cancer as well as environmental deterioration. Furthermore, the destruction of ozone layer affects all of us, because in the end, the environment where people cannot live will be formed while an ecosystem is being destroyed.
In order to address this problem, Canada made an important contribution to the environmental health. Canada has been involved in many international treaties, including the Montreal Protocol and the Kyoto Accord.
An international agreement, the Montreal Protocol, was implemented in 1987 to protect the ozone layer from further depletion. It eventually helped humans to prevent getting skin cancer and preserved the environment by protecting the ozone layer surrounding the Earth. The amount of CFCs and harmful substances are remarkably decreased by promoting the Montreal Protocol. After all, the Montreal Protocol successfully phased out most CFCs.
On the other hand, the increase in the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is considered the cause of the increase in global temperatures. This occurred because of the Industrial Revolution and the burning of fossil fuels. In 1997, the Kyoto Accord was established to reduce greenhouse gases that cause climate change. The Kyoto Accord aimed to curb the air pollution, but failed to tackle the issue of global warming. The reason was because industrial and influential nations such as Canada and the United States have not positively committed to this environmental plan.
It seems that Canada has taken a significant role in promoting positive global change, particularly in improving global health and wellness. However, Canada has not ratified its commitment to the action when it came to the Kyoto Accord. In order to effectively address ozone layer depletion, Canada as well as other countries of influence and relative affluence all over the world must join together and take responsibility for the global environment for the future of the earth.
Above all, it clearly reveals that we will not be able to live without the ozone layer that is located in the Stratosphere. If it happens to disappear, every living thing will be gone or mutate into the species that can even survive even if they receive ultraviolet rays. In order to maintain our lives, CFCs or Halon gas must be strongly restricted and at the same time, we should spend all strength in developing a replaceable substance.
Hence, each one of us must act now to avoid further damage by reducing products that contain either CFC gas or Halon gas, removing an atom of chlorine or bromine that can damage an ozone layer. We should also use a fan instead of an air conditioner and use a hair gel instead of a hair spray.
If each and every one of us do not make efforts to combat climate change, global warming will continue and eventually ozone depletion will be worsened. It is essential to remember that destruction of the ozone layer will damage human, animal, and plant life. Therefore, all of us should take an action to reduce further ozone destruction!
Atmospheric brown clouds
In recent years, more and more people have started to take notice on how much the weather and climate has been changing. Air pollution is the introduction of chemicals, particulate matter, or biological materials into the atmosphere. These pollutants can cause harm or discomfort to living organisms, and certain pollutants can remain in the environment and accumulate over time. Aerosols consist of sulfates, nitrates, black carbon, hundreds of organic compounds, and fly ash; when sunlight is absorbed and scattered by aerosols, it creates a brown colored haze. This creates Brown clouds, which can be found all over the world, however the biggest concern is in Asia.
The Asian Brown Cloud/Haze is an especially important problem in concerns of the creation and the effects of it. First we have to answer the question: What is the Asian Brown Cloud? The Asian Brown Cloud is a layer of air pollution that covers parts of the northern Indian Ocean, India, Pakistan, and parts of South Asia, Southwest Asia, and China.
The causes for this cloud is caused mainly by domestic wood and dung fires plus smoke from the burning of forests and fields for agriculture. In addition vehicle exhausts, power plants, factory chimneys, characteristic of biomass burning and industrial emissions due to incomplete burning are all added to the mix. Burning biomass such as dried twigs, leaves and dung, and agricultural slash-and-burn practices, are common across poor, rural Asian areas.
The Asian Brown Cloud interferes with the normal distribution of solar energy from the sun to the atmosphere and the surface of the earth by absorbing and deflecting light energy. Black soot particles in the Asian Brown Cloud absorbs the sunlight and warms the atmosphere around the area, it is calculated that the cloud boosted the effect of solar heating on the air around it by almost 50 percent. The overall effect is that the layer of land and air extending from the surface to the troposphere will be overall generally warmed by the Asian Brown Cloud and similar clouds.
Another reason why the Brown Clouds in Asia are some of the biggest concerns is; that this area is home to half of the world’s population and the haze problem is particularly acute in Asia because of the large emissions of aerosols and the unique seasonal climate conditions. At ScienceNetlinks: Science Updates Asian Brown Clouds, it posted a Podcast on the Asian Brown cloud. The cloud is associated with winter monsoon (December to April) during which there is no rain to wash pollution from the air.
The Asian Brown Cloud is such a major concern in regards to other clouds because while in America and Europe the haze hovers above it, in Asia it is altering the weather, creating acid rain. This causes a lot of damage to agriculture, oceans and trees.
Acid Rain Precipitation
The environmental effects are tremendous in regards to the Asian Brown cloud. The Himalayan glaciers provide the source of many of Asia’s great rivers, with millions of people depending on them for food and water. Asian Brown Clouds increase atmospheric heating these glaciers are in retreat for the past number of decades. They carry large amounts of soot and black carbon which are deposited on the glaciers, allowing them to absorb more of the sun’s heat and melt quicker. Asian Brown Clouds are also interfering with centuries old monsoon patterns with disastrous consequences for food production.
As explained in the PDF Atmospheric Brown Clouds, they also affect natural events
In most parts of Asia, dust storms, called yellow sand
events, contain large amounts of mineral-dust aerosols.
When combined with brown clouds, they impair
visibility, pose health threats, and cause strong
changes in the atmosphere. Black carbon particles
mixed with dust during yellow sand events are
transported across the Pacific Ocean, contributing to
atmospheric brown clouds in the Pacific region.
Health Effects of ABC's
The health impact of these particles is an increase in cardiovascular effects, pulmonary illnesses and chronic respiratory problems. The report estimates that in India and China alone, Asian Brown Clouds result in over 330,000 excess deaths per year. Outdoor air pollution harms more than 1.1 billion people per year and kills an estimated 0.5 million people while indoor air pollution (from burning wood, animal waste, and coal for cooking and heating) kills more than 2.2 million people per year with over 98% of them located in developing countries.
Governments and people who are looking into the Asian Brown Cloud and other Brown clouds:
ABC was initiated by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) with financial support for the US component from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and participating member nations. The initial funding is for a five-year period beginning in 2003. The aim of the first phase of this program is to study the impact of atmospheric brown clouds on a number of parameters, including monsoon change, water balance, agriculture, and health. ABC scientists plan to establish a network of ground-based monitoring stations throughout the Indo-Asian and the Pacific regions to study the composition and seasonal patterns of brown clouds. UNEP has pledged to facilitate this long-term research program.
The Project Atmospheric Brown Cloud (ABC) is: A preliminary assessment using the Indian Ocean Experiment (INDOEX) research was completed and the potential impacts caused by brown clouds on human health, food security and the water were disseminated in 2002. Also United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)has facilitated an international science team to look into observation, science and impacts of ABC on regional climate, water budget, agriculture and human health. The aim of Project Atmospheric Brown Cloud (ABC) is to better understand the science and its impacts in order to provide a scientific basis for informed decision making.
The ABC’s layer was observed during the Indian Ocean Experiment (INODEX) intensive field observation in 1999.
1999 INODEX Intensive Field Phase Platforms – Link
In summary the Asian Brown Clouds has become a very serious and lethal situation, since the cloud has been affecting the air quality and agriculture of the areas below it and has increasingly been affecting human health and food production for at least 3 million people. These Brown Clouds are NOT restricted to one area, since Europe and America have some too, however the situation is far more severe in Asia than anywhere else. The ABC project and the INODEX research has been helping scientists on better understanding the impacts on the environment this has had, as well as help look at the development of these clouds and ways to try and reduce them.
For More information on the facts and Myths of Asian Brown clouds please check out the PDF file: Asian Brown Cloud Fact and Fantasy
For more on Air pollution in regards to clouds check this PDF file out: Pollution and Clouds
Youtube video on [CNN] Asia\’s Pollution Super-Cloud 2008.11.13