{"id":4100,"date":"2014-06-06T06:36:08","date_gmt":"2014-06-06T10:36:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/?p=4100"},"modified":"2014-06-17T10:54:21","modified_gmt":"2014-06-17T14:54:21","slug":"from-computational-thinking-to-systems-thinking","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/2014\/06\/from-computational-thinking-to-systems-thinking\/","title":{"rendered":"From Computational Thinking to Systems Thinking"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ll be heading off to Stockholm in August to present a paper at <a title=\"ICT4S conference website\" href=\"http:\/\/2014.ict4s.org\" target=\"_blank\">the 2nd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Sustainability (ICT4S&#8217;2014)<\/a>. The theme of the conference this year is &#8220;ICT and transformational change&#8221;, which got me thinking about how we think about change, and especially whether we equip students in computing with the right conceptual toolkit to think about change. I ended up writing a long critique of <a title=\"See for example the work at CMU on teaching computational thinking\" href=\"http:\/\/www.cs.cmu.edu\/~CompThink\/\" target=\"_blank\">Computational Thinking<\/a>, which has become popular lately as a way of describing what we teach in computing undergrad programs. I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anything wrong with computational thinking in small doses. But when an entire university program teaches nothing but computational thinking, we turn out generations of computing professionals who are ill-equipped to think about complex societal issues. This then makes them particularly vulnerable to <a title=\"See for example, Evgeny Morozov's take on solutionism\" href=\"http:\/\/www.thedailybeast.com\/articles\/2013\/03\/05\/the-internet-won-t-save-us-evgeny-morozov-s-stand-against-technology-solutionism.html\" target=\"_blank\">technological solutionism<\/a>. I hope the paper will provoke some interesting discussion!<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the abstract for my paper (<a title=\"Full paper, From Computational Thinking to Systems Thinking\" href=\"http:\/\/www.cs.toronto.edu\/~sme\/papers\/2014\/Easterbrook-ICT4S-2014.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">click here for the full paper<\/a>):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>From Computational Thinking to Systems Thinking: A conceptual toolkit for sustainability computing<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Steve Easterbrook, University of Toronto<\/p>\n<p>If information and communication technologies (ICT) are to bring about a transformational change to a sustainable society, then we need to transform our thinking. Computer professionals already have a conceptual toolkit for problem solving, sometimes known as computational thinking. However, computational thinking tends to see the world in terms a series of problems (or problem types) that have computational solutions (or solution types). Sustainability, on the other hand, demands a more systemic approach, to avoid technological solutionism, and to acknowledge that technology, human behaviour and environmental impacts are tightly inter-related. In this paper, I argue that systems thinking provides the necessary bridge from computational thinking to sustainability practice, as it provides a domain ontology for reasoning about sustainability, a conceptual basis for reasoning about transformational change, and a set of methods for critical thinking about the social and environmental impacts of technology. I end the paper with a set of suggestions for how to build these ideas into the undergraduate curriculum for computer and information sciences.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ll be heading off to Stockholm in August to present a paper at the 2nd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Sustainability (ICT4S&#8217;2014). The theme of the conference this year is &#8220;ICT and transformational change&#8221;, which got me thinking about how we think about change, and especially whether we equip students in computing [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":393,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[57],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4100"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/393"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4100"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4100\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4104,"href":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4100\/revisions\/4104"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4100"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4100"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4100"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}