{"id":1352,"date":"2010-02-09T23:13:11","date_gmt":"2010-02-10T04:13:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/?p=1352"},"modified":"2010-02-10T16:12:39","modified_gmt":"2010-02-10T21:12:39","slug":"can-we-get-on-with-some-science-please","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/2010\/02\/can-we-get-on-with-some-science-please\/","title":{"rendered":"Can we get on with some science please?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve been distracted over the last few months with all these attacks on climate science. It&#8217;s like watching a car crash in slow motion. I know enough about climate science to be skeptical of absolutely <a title=\"They can't even quote scientists accurately and fairly, as BigCityLib points out\" href=\"http:\/\/bigcitylib.blogspot.com\/2010\/02\/litany-of-misquotation.html\" target=\"_blank\">everything<\/a> written on the topic in the mainstream media. And yet\u00a0I still feel compelled to read about each new revelation trumpeted in the press, and I feel compelled to do the necessary digging to find out what&#8217;s really going on. Well, I&#8217;m done with it. I&#8217;ve seen enough. I&#8217;m finally looking away. And I&#8217;m taking away some lessons about human behaviour, and most of it isn&#8217;t pretty. Many of the people attacking the scientists are <a title=\"Michael Tobis has picked out some juicier lunacy from the comments on his blog\" href=\"http:\/\/initforthegold.blogspot.com\/2010\/02\/grim-amusement.html\" target=\"_blank\">truly nasty people<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Take climategate, for example (please!). It really was a non-event &#8211; a <a title=\"FactCheck.org does a nice investigation, concluding that it affects the science not one jot\" href=\"http:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2009\/12\/climategate\/\" target=\"_blank\">series of trumped up claims with no substance<\/a>. We already knew the <a title=\"Scientific American has a nice piece debunking many of their arguments\" href=\"http:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article.cfm?id=seven-answers-to-climate-contrarian-nonsense\" target=\"_blank\">contrarians talk nonsense<\/a>. At worse, some requests for access to data were mishandled. By scientists who were being hounded by an army of attack drones. What did those FOI requests look like? Well mostly they\u00a0<a title=\"Rabett Run shows some sample FOI request templates\" href=\"http:\/\/rabett.blogspot.com\/2010\/02\/steve-had-little-list.html\" target=\"_blank\">looked the same<\/a>, because when Steve McIntyre was told that some of the metereological data was not available to non-academics because of commercial licencing agreements, he threw a hissy fit and told the lunatics that follow his blog to fire off FOI requests at the CRU. Sixty FOI requests in one weekend! Which makes them all vexatious, and probably counts as harrassment. Which is bad enough, but some of McIntyre&#8217;s followers did worse, and\u00a0<a title=\"Interview with Phil Jones at the TimesOnline.\" href=\"http:\/\/www.timesonline.co.uk\/tol\/news\/environment\/article7017905.ece\">started firing off death threats<\/a>. Death threats?!? <span style=\"text-decoration: line-through;\">Sometimes<\/span> Often I think I&#8217;m on the wrong planet.<\/p>\n<p>Or take the hockey stick controversy. Michael Mann was smeared again as a result of the CRU emails, but on investigation <a title=\"James Annan summarizes the investigation findings\" href=\"http:\/\/julesandjames.blogspot.com\/2010\/02\/mann-cleared-almost.html\" target=\"_blank\">his name was cleared<\/a>. The previous attempts to smear him, through the Wegman Investigation, turns out to be <a title=\"Desmogblog spills the beans\" href=\"http:\/\/www.desmogblog.com\/plagiarism-conspiracies-felonies-breaking-out-wegman-file\" target=\"_blank\">nothing but a political attack<\/a>, put together by staffers in Senator Inhofe&#8217;s office. While any errors in Mann&#8217;s initial attempts at dendrochronology reconstructions have been long since been corrected, and and the results confirmed by other studies (that&#8217;s how science works, remember?), a group of obsessive denialists just won&#8217;t let the issue drop.<\/p>\n<p>David Brin calls it a\u00a0<a title=\"David Brin's blog\" href=\"http:\/\/davidbrin.blogspot.com\/2010\/02\/real-struggle-behind-climate-change-war.html\" target=\"_blank\">war on expertise<\/a>. A bunch untrained <a title=\"Biodiversivist used the term before I did!\" href=\"http:\/\/biodiversivist.blogspot.com\/2009\/11\/armchair-climatologist.html\" target=\"_blank\">armchair climatologists<\/a> think they know more about the field than geoscientists who have been studying it as a fulltime career for decades. Or, more precisely, they think they can do a little poking and find errors, and that those errors will invalidate the science. Because they really really want the science to be wrong. Actually, I really really want the science to be wrong too, but I&#8217;m not so stupid as to think I can poke holes in it without first becoming an expert. If the science is wrong, you&#8217;ll read about it first in the peer-reviewed literature.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve been distracted over the last few months with all these attacks on climate science. It&#8217;s like watching a car crash in slow motion. I know enough about climate science to be skeptical of absolutely everything written on the topic in the mainstream media. And yet\u00a0I still feel compelled to read about each new revelation [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":392,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,8],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1352"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/392"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1352"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1352\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1368,"href":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1352\/revisions\/1368"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1352"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1352"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.easterbrook.ca\/steve\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1352"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}