<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Modularizing Climate Models</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.easterbrook.ca/steve/?feed=rss2&#038;p=196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.easterbrook.ca/steve/?p=196</link>
	<description>Or, What has Software Engineering got to do with Climate Change?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:42:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Susannah Burrows</title>
		<link>http://www.easterbrook.ca/steve/?p=196&#038;cpage=1#comment-1068</link>
		<dc:creator>Susannah Burrows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.easterbrook.ca/steve/?p=196#comment-1068</guid>
		<description>Another effort in this direction is the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy), developed at the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Mainz (where I&#039;m a PhD student).  It has a smaller development/user community than some others, but probably gets closer to the ideal of modularity than most.  The project has its own set of coding standards and a generalized interface structure.  It is organized primarily around &quot;process models&quot; (convection, chemical kinetics, deposition) rather than model domains (land, sea, air).  The primary application of the &quot;MESSy&quot; interface is the ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry model (EMAC), i.e. GCM + lots of submodels related to atmospheric chemistry.

The website:
http://www.messy-interface.org/

The citation:
Patrick Jöckel, Rolf Sander, Astrid Kerkweg, Holger Tost, and Jos Lelieveld, Technical Note: The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) - a new approach towards Earth System Modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 433-444, 2005.
http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/433</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another effort in this direction is the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy), developed at the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Mainz (where I&#8217;m a PhD student).  It has a smaller development/user community than some others, but probably gets closer to the ideal of modularity than most.  The project has its own set of coding standards and a generalized interface structure.  It is organized primarily around &#8220;process models&#8221; (convection, chemical kinetics, deposition) rather than model domains (land, sea, air).  The primary application of the &#8220;MESSy&#8221; interface is the ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry model (EMAC), i.e. GCM + lots of submodels related to atmospheric chemistry.</p>
<p>The website:<br />
<a href="http://www.messy-interface.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.messy-interface.org/</a></p>
<p>The citation:<br />
Patrick Jöckel, Rolf Sander, Astrid Kerkweg, Holger Tost, and Jos Lelieveld, Technical Note: The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) &#8211; a new approach towards Earth System Modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 433-444, 2005.<br />
<a href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/433" rel="nofollow">http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/433</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
