<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exploiting Spatial Memory: Code Canvas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.easterbrook.ca/steve/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.easterbrook.ca/steve/?p=1267</link>
	<description>Or, What has Software Engineering got to do with Climate Change?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:42:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://www.easterbrook.ca/steve/?p=1267&#038;cpage=1#comment-1569</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.easterbrook.ca/steve/?p=1267#comment-1569</guid>
		<description>I worked for a while on large ontologies, and one of the lessons I learned there was not everyone needs the &#039;birds eye view&#039; approach (overview;zoom and filter; details on demand). The people who actually edited these things everyday only really cared about the details part. Like literate programming: who is the audience? Most developers don&#039;t see the payoff. Maybe Javadoc annotations are as much as we can expect.

As an aside, you really ought to post this stuff to FriendFeed. It is a great venue for discussing these issues. 

P.S. As you are on sabbatical, can we expect you to be coding in Fortran soon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked for a while on large ontologies, and one of the lessons I learned there was not everyone needs the &#8216;birds eye view&#8217; approach (overview;zoom and filter; details on demand). The people who actually edited these things everyday only really cared about the details part. Like literate programming: who is the audience? Most developers don&#8217;t see the payoff. Maybe Javadoc annotations are as much as we can expect.</p>
<p>As an aside, you really ought to post this stuff to FriendFeed. It is a great venue for discussing these issues. </p>
<p>P.S. As you are on sabbatical, can we expect you to be coding in Fortran soon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.easterbrook.ca/steve/?p=1267&#038;cpage=1#comment-1567</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.easterbrook.ca/steve/?p=1267#comment-1567</guid>
		<description>How about &quot;an extensible programming system&quot;? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about &#8220;an extensible programming system&#8221;? <img src='http://www.easterbrook.ca/steve/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
